⚖️ A LEGAL STRIKE AT CASTE PRIDE
⚖️ A LEGAL STRIKE AT CASTE PRIDE
In a landmark decision the
Allahabad High Court has issued a significant judgement on September 16,
2025 in the case of Praveen Chetri vs State of UP and Others. It
aimed at dismantling the deep-rooted caste system in India banning the mention
of castes in police records and orders action against the use of caste-based
stickers on vehicles.
This ruling is hailed as a
significant step towards achieving a truly caste-less society. It reinforces
the constitutional ideal of equality under Article 14 of the Indian
Constitution. It strikes at a practice that the court has described as a “Legal
Fallacy” and a means of “Identity Profiling”.
⚖️ Legal Fallacy &
Identification Fallacy
- The Legal Fallacy – The defense that
mentioning caste is justified because it has been a long-standing practice
in police manuals and government forms.
- Court’s View: A tradition that violates the
constitutional principle of equality, enshrined in the Preamble
and Article 14, must be changed.
- The Identification Fallacy – The belief that
mentioning caste in official documents (FIR, Seizure Memos) is necessary
for proper identification.
- Court’s View: This serves no lawful purpose
and in fact reinforces prejudice.
π« BAN ON CASTE IN POLICE
REPORTS
- No more caste entries – The Court directed
the UP government to immediately stop the practice of mentioning a
person’s caste in police documents such as FIRs, Arrest Memos, Police
Station Notice Boards, etc. It reinforces prejudice and violates
fundamental rights.
- Alternative Identification – To address the
concern of identifying individuals with similar names, the court suggested
using parents’ name, Aadhaar number, fingerprints, and mobile numbers.
- Exception – The only exception is in cases
filed under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of
Atrocities) Act, where identifying caste is a necessary legal
requirement.
- Government Action – In compliance with the
High Court’s Order, the UP government has issued directives to all police
units and district administration to remove caste references from police
records and public notices. The state’s CCTNS portal will be
updated to delete caste fields, and officials instructed to leave such
fields blank until changes are complete.
π ACTION AGAINST CASTE
STICKERS ON VEHICLES
- Ban on Stickers and Slogans – High Court
observed that the display of caste-based stickers, slogans, and
identifiers on vehicles is a “Coded Assertion of Social Power”
undermining constitutional values.
- Penalties – Vehicles displaying caste names
and slogans to be fined under the Motor Vehicles Act.
- Government Action – UP Government has
ordered authorities to issue challans to vehicles with caste-based
stickers and slogans.
π BROADER DIRECTIVES AND
OBSERVATIONS
- Caste-Based Rallies & Social Media – The
judgement also addresses caste glorification in public and digital spaces.
It bans caste-based political rallies and urges stricter monitoring on
social media to prevent caste pride or hate content.
- Anti-National Practice – The Court condemned
caste glorification as “Anti-National”, quoting Dr. B.R.
Ambedkar’s warning that caste divisions are a threat to India’s unity.
True patriotism lies in respecting the Constitution and not in one’s
lineage.
- Removal of Public Sign Boards – The UP
Government has directed the removal of sign boards in towns and villages
that glorify caste identities or declare areas as belonging to a
particular caste.
✅ Conclusion
Praveen Chetri vs State of UP
and Others judgement has effectively transformed a routine liquor
smuggling case into a profound indictment of the pervasive and
anti-constitutional practice of caste identification.
In a modern, secular and
democratic India, the state and its institutions must actively dismantle,
not reinforce, the psychological and social architecture of the caste system.
The Court reaffirmed that true
national pride lies not in lineage, but in upholding constitutional values of
equality, fraternity, and a casteless society.
This case proves that even a
small matter can spark a major revolution in public mindset and policy,
becoming a catalyst for legal and social reform in Uttar Pradesh – aimed
at promoting a more egalitarian and casteless society.
✍️ Author:
Advocate Mamta Shukla
Supreme Court of India π
9560044035
Comments
Post a Comment