POSH Accountability Redefined: Is Your Organization Ready for Judicial Audit?
POSH ACCOUNTABILITY REDEFINED: ARE YOUR RECORDS READY FOR JUDICIAL AUDIT?
The post-enactment phase of
India's Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and
Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act) marks a decisive transition — from
simple compliance to structural transparency and stringent enforcement. This evolution is being driven by significant interventions across legal,
judicial, and digital domains.
LEGAL & CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY: MANDATORY DISCLOSURES
The most impactful shift in
corporate governance is the move towards mandatory, data-driven POSH
disclosures at the board level.
Earlier Compliance
Companies were often only
required to make a one-line statement confirming the constitution of an
Internal Committee (IC) in their Directors’ Report under the Companies Act,
2013.
The Shift to Transparency
Amendments by the Ministry ofCorporate Affairs (MCA) now mandate detailed disclosures in the
Board’s Report — requiring specific data points that promote genuine
accountability.
Mandatory Disclosures in the Board’s Report (Revised Rule 8(5)):
- Complaints Received: Total number of sexual
harassment complaints received during the financial year.
- Cases Disposed Of: Number of cases
successfully resolved.
- Pending Complaints: Number of complaints
pending inquiry for more than 90 days.
- Employee Gender Composition: Breakdown of
employees by gender (men, women, transgender persons).
This amendment makes compliance demonstrable
and measurable.
Failure to provide correct or complete disclosure can attract regulatory
scrutiny and reputational damage.
Organizations must:
- Maintain accurate and timely complaint data.
- Ensure ICCs adhere to the 90-day inquiry
timeline.
- Standardize documentation and procedures
across offices and subsidiaries.
CONSEQUENCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE
Failure to meet disclosure
obligations attracts penalties under both the POSH Act and the Companies Act,
turning POSH compliance into a critical business and governance metric.
JUDICIAL PUSH: COMPLIANCE AUDITS AND ENFORCEMENT
The Supreme Court of India
has issued landmark directives that transform the compliance framework from
voluntary adherence to mandated, auditable action.
The Aureliano Fernandes v. TheState of Goa (2023)
The Court affirmed that POSH
compliance is a constitutional duty, not a mere statutory formality.
Key Directives for All
Employers/Institutions:
- Mandatory ICC Constitution: Every workplace
with ≥10 employees must form an ICC.
- External Member: ICC must include an
external member with expertise in women’s issues or law.
- Periodic Training: All ICC members and
relevant personnel must undergo regular training.
- Mandatory Inspections & Audits: District
Officers and Labour Commissioners to conduct routine inspections and
surveys.
- Deadlines & Penalties: Non-compliance
may lead to strict penalties, including cancellation or
non-renewal of business licenses (e.g., deadline Sept 28, 2025).
DIGITAL REDRESSAL & MONITORING: THE SHe-BOX EXPANSION
The SHe-Box (Sexual Harassment
electronic-Box) portal, launched by the Ministry of Women and Child
Development (MWCD), has evolved into a national compliance and redressal
ecosystem.
Core Features
- Single-Window Platform: Enables women from
all sectors to lodge complaints online.
- Real-Time Tracking: Automatically forwards
complaints to the relevant IC or LC.
- Compliance Control Tower: Serves as a national
compliance repository for the government.
Impact and Significance
- Empowering the Unorganized Sector: Bridges
access gaps for women in informal workplaces.
- Strengthening Judicial Oversight: Supports
nationwide compliance audits and enforces the 90-day inquiry timeline.
- Digital Traceability: Creates a digital
paper trail, linking IC registration with complaint redressal —
ensuring institutional accountability.
STATUTORY PENALTIES (SECTION 26 OF POSH ACT)
|
Offense |
First Conviction Penalty |
Repeat Offense Penalty |
|
Failure to constitute an IC |
₹50,000 |
Up to ₹1,00,000 |
|
Failure to act on IC/LC recommendations |
₹50,000 |
Fine may be doubled |
|
Failure to file the Annual Report |
₹50,000 |
Fine may be doubled |
|
Contravening other provisions (training, SHe-Box registration, etc.) |
₹50,000 |
Fine may be doubled |
|
Consequence of Repeat Offense |
— |
License cancellation/non-renewal |
Note: Failure to register
ICs on SHe-Box (where mandated) constitutes a compliance violation, attracting
statutory fines.
JUDICIAL AND FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES
Beyond statutory fines, non-compliance
invites severe judicial and financial repercussions:
- Exemplary Damages: Courts have awarded
compensation in crores for systemic failure to ensure a safe workplace.
- Contempt of Court: Post the Aureliano
Fernandes ruling, non-compliance with IC constitution or SHe-Box
registration may attract contempt proceedings.
REPUTATIONAL AND BUSINESS RISKS
Digital accountability amplifies
the non-statutory consequences:
- Reputational Damage: Non-compliance severely
harms public trust and brand image.
- Mandatory Disclosure: False or missing
disclosure in the Board’s Report invites MCA scrutiny and penalties.
- Talent Attrition: A poor safety record
hinders recruitment and retention of women professionals.
LEGISLATIVE INTERVENTIONS: EMPOWERING COMPLAINANTS
Proposed amendments aim to make
the law more survivor-centric and reduce reporting barriers.
|
Aspect |
Current POSH Act, 2013 |
Proposed Amendment, 2024 |
|
Complaint Filing Timeline (Sec 9) |
3 months (extendable by 3 months) |
1 year (with unlimited discretionary extension) |
|
Conciliation (Sec 10) |
Allowed (at complainant’s request) |
Removed — all complaints must undergo inquiry |
Rationale
- Extended Timeline: Recognizes trauma and
fear that delay reporting.
- Removal of Conciliation: Prevents coercion
and ensures every complaint receives a formal inquiry.
IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNAL
COMMITTEES (ICs)
1. Enhanced Mandate and
Discretion
- Increased Workload: Every case now requires
a full inquiry.
- Broader Discretion: ICs can condone delays
beyond one year but must document reasons meticulously.
2. Evidence Management &
Fairness
- Delayed Evidence Risks: Witness memory
fades; digital records may be deleted.
- Need for Robust Protocols:
- Standardized documentation at every inquiry stage.
- Policies for evidence preservation and
legal holds upon receiving incident intimation.
IMPLICATIONS FOR EMPLOYERS
1. Policy and Procedural
Overhaul
- Update internal POSH policies to reflect new
timelines and removal of conciliation.
- Conduct advanced IC training on handling
delayed cases and evidence.
2. Increased Corporate
Accountability
- Expect more formal inquiries and potential
litigation.
- Focus shifts from resolution to prevention,
requiring visible safety initiatives and awareness programs.
CONCLUSION
The new phase of POSH enforcement
marks a decisive shift in India’s regulatory landscape — from paper
compliance to auditable accountability. With legal, judicial, and digital frameworks converging, organizations must now
demonstrate institutional maturity and a genuine commitment to safe,
equitable workplaces.
About the Author
Adv. Mamta Singh Shukla is an Advocate at the Supreme Court of India and Founder of Vijay Foundations — an initiative dedicated to social justice, education, and empowerment. Through her writings, she advocates for human dignity, equality, and systemic change.
🌿 Thank You for Reading!
Your support inspires us to keep sharing meaningful stories on law, society, and empowerment.
Follow Vijay Foundations for more legal insights, awareness campaigns, and updates.

.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)

Comments
Post a Comment